Email Blog Blast
   

Recent Posts

  • Sacramento Mortgage Rates: Fed Cuts Rates
  • Sacramento Mortgage Rates: An Historic Week You Betcha
  • Sacramento Mortgage Rate Update: The Bailout
  • Still Here; Just Little Time for Blogging
  • 100% Financing Options, Try CalFHA’s New Program
  • Nehemiah Fading Fast, FHA Down Payment Increases
  • Nehemiah & Seller-Funded Down Payment Assistance
  • Financial Title Company Closes Down Suddenly
  • Nehemiah Draws Its Last Breath
  • The End of The Line For Nehemiah?
  Real Estate Blogs - Blog Top Sites 
Submit
your blog   Top
Blogs
  Success Session Graduate
Site search:

Categories:

  • 100% Financing (11)
  • 1st X Buyer (3)
  • Affordable Payments (7)
  • Appraisals (4)
  • Area Stats (7)
  • Changing Guidelines (24)
  • Credit & Ficos (9)
  • Economy (15)
  • FHA/VA (12)
  • Flipping (1)
  • Housing Bubble (9)
  • Interest-Only (3)
  • Legislation (6)
  • Loan Fraud (6)
  • Mortgage Programs (35)
  • Mortgage Rates (63)
  • Neg Am Loans (5)
  • PMI (5)
  • Qualifying (26)
  • Rants (14)
  • Reverse Mtgs (1)
  • Sac Real Estate (33)
  • Short Sales/REO (7)
  • Stated Income (4)
  • Subprime Meltdown (27)
  • True Stories (8)
  • Uncategorized (3)
  • About
  • Contact

Fannie & Freddie Remove the 5% “Declining Market” Penalty


In the last couple of weeks, both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have lifted the 5% reduction in LTV required for loans in “declining markets”. For those unfamiliar with this policy, here’s what transpired in the past few months.

For markets designated as “declining”, “stressed”, or in some cases “severely distressed”, the agencies began requiring a 5% reduction in the maximum loan-to-value allowed. Thus the 100% conforming programs like My Community Mortgage and Home Possible had become de facto 95% loans.

At that point, borrowers had to come up with 5% in down payment and qualify under the 100% program rules (think income restrictions and higher interest rates) in order to get a loan. In turn, ordinary 95% conforming loan limits were reduced to 90%, and so on. This was the change that drove everyone back to FHA financing, where a borrower can still finance up to 97% of the price and use a non-profit gift from Nehemiah to cover the down payment.

So Why The Change of Heart?

That’s a question for which I’ve not found a good answer. The real estate market crisis certainly isn’t over–especially here in California, where the number of foreclosures hitting the market is at peak flow. Furthermore, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are still losing money on bad loans within their portfolios and have only escaped reform by the distraction of the current crisis and the upcoming elections. So what would cause them to take on additional risk at this point in the cycle?

In the absence of a better explanation, the cynical side of me says politics is at the root. Because at the same time that the Agencies are relaxing their rules, the mortgage insurance companies who insure these loans are in full retreat. At this moment, almost none will insure 95% loans anymore. So, Fannie & Freddie can play good dad and let you go to the all-nighter, knowing mom will never allow it.

So, if you are confused by the news, just remember it’s the mortgage insurance companies who really hold the key.

Share This



« Buying Investment Properties All Cash? Watch Your Step
Sacramento Mortgage Rates on the Rise »

This entry was posted on Sunday, May 18th, 2008 at 10:17 am and is filed under Changing Guidelines, PMI. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Fannie & Freddie Remove the 5% “Declining Market” Penalty”

  1. Rick Belben Says:
    June 8th, 2008 at 2:04 pm

    You got it right in that it does not matter what Fannie & Freddie will do if there is no one out there who will insure them. From a publicity point of view it makes them look better.

Leave a Reply


 
LendingClarity.com is proudly powered by TomatoBlogs
Login